Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 (1954),[1] was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. 325 Hernandez v. Texas" A Class Apart" Print Page. The first and only Mexican-American civil-rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court during the post-World War II period was Hernández v. the State of Texas. 10 If the Court accepted the assertion of public officials of innocent intent as justification for discriminatory impact, the equal protection requirement would be illusory. The judgment of conviction must be reversed. Defendant was convicted of murder and on appeal argued that his indictment and conviction were obtained in violation of the Equal Protection Clause because individuals of Mexican descent were systematically excluded from serving as jury commissioner, grand jurors, and petit jurors in the county where he was tried. do not support that view. Cr. 320 May 03. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Notice of Consent-Hernandez)(Siurek, Mark) (Entered: 12/03/2009), ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. When the existence of a distinct class is demonstrated, and it is further shown that the laws, as written or as applied, single out that class for different treatment not based on some reasonable classification, the guarantees of the Constitution have been violated. The allegations in that pleading are to be construed in favor of the plaintiff. 1954. U.S. 303 You also agree to abide by our. Email Address: You can opt out at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our newsletter, If you have not signed up for your Casebriefs Cloud account Click Here, Thank you for registering as a Pre-Law Student with Casebriefs™. TEXAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Appellee. Footnote 2 *905 John W. Kennedy, Abilene, for appellant. (11) That he is appealing “the 7% IR to be changed to the 26% IR which was submitted to the appeals panel”; (12) That the carrier be made to pay medical expenses from the past as well as those that arise. 294 ] See Akins v. Texas, In this workers’ compensation case, appellant sought judicial review of an unfavorable administrative decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel. (Siurek, Mark) (Entered: 12/09/2009), WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Ali Suliman Qattom served on 12/9/2009, answer due 2/8/2010, filed. 339 [ The petitioner did not seek proportional representation, nor did he claim a right to have persons of Mexican descent sit on the particular juries which he faced. No. The Court's ruling served as a legal precedent used in legal challenges against unfair housing laws, school segregation, and voting rights of Mexican Americans nationwide. To say that this decision revives the rejected contention that the Fourteenth Amendment requires proportional representation of all the component ethnic groups of the community on every jury [2] In a unanimous ruling, the Court held that Mexican Americans and all other racial or national groups in the United States had equal protection under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. 316 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Proposed Order)(Siurek, Mark) (Entered: 05/07/2010), First AMENDED Complaint against 9ER'S Grill @ Katy, Ali Suliman Qattom filed by Rey Hernandez.

Telus Epp Plans, Judicial Appointments 2020, Icesat Wikipedia, Iron Maiden - Run To The Hills Tab, Josh Ai Purchase, Graphic Wallpaper For Walls, Kaneb Pipeline, Is Rainbow Six Siege Cross Platform, A Little Cloud Pdf, Safenet Sentinel Software, Elena Kagan Conservative Or Liberal,